Weird Science

Stopping the Invisible

Polish ver­sion is here

The fol­lo­wing article was ori­gi­nally publi­shed in the jour­nal for edu­ca­tors Che­mia w Szkole (eng. Che­mi­stry in School) (4/2019):

Ilustracja

Ples M., Zatrzy­mać nie­wi­dzialne (eng. Stop­ping the Invi­si­ble), Che­mia w Szkole (eng. Che­mi­stry in School), 4 (2019), Agen­cja AS Józef Szew­czyk, pp. 36-43

With sum­mer now in full swing, at least at the time of wri­ting, it seems appro­priate to pause and con­si­der how solar radia­tion affects the human body. Set­ting aside the other com­po­nents of sun­li­ght, this article will focus on the band most com­monly regar­ded as the most harm­ful.

Radia­tion with wave­leng­ths shor­ter than what our eyes can see yet lon­ger than X-rays, appro­xi­ma­tely 10–400 nm, is cal­led ultra­vio­let (UV). Some sour­ces place the lower UV limit at 100 nm. The name is Latin in ori­gin (ultra mea­ning "bey­ond") [1]. Ultra­vio­let light was disco­ve­red in the 19th cen­tury, and as so often hap­pens, it was iden­ti­fied inde­pen­den­tly by two rese­ar­chers: phy­si­cist Johann Wil­helm Rit­ter and che­mist Wil­liam Hyde Wol­la­ston.

Because UV car­ries rela­ti­vely high pho­ton energy, it has distinct effects on living sys­tems. For prac­ti­cal pur­po­ses, it is sub­di­vi­ded into conven­tio­nal ran­ges:

UV-A lies clo­sest to the visi­ble band, and we might say figu­ra­ti­vely that it is only sli­gh­tly “more vio­let than vio­let.” It is also com­pa­ra­ti­vely the least harm­ful. That does not make it harm­less: pro­lon­ged expo­sure dama­ges col­la­gen fibers in the skin, acce­le­ra­ting pho­to­a­ging. Large doses of UV-A may induce len­ti­cu­lar opa­ci­fi­ca­tion, resul­ting in cata­ract for­ma­tion. UV-B and UV-C typi­cally do not reach the lens because they are absor­bed by the cor­nea, the eye’s pro­tec­tive outer layer.

We know UV-B expo­sure in skin pro­du­ces cho­le­cal­ci­fe­rol C27H44O, vita­min D3, which the body needs. Only very small doses of this light are requ­i­red, howe­ver. Higher doses of UV-B and UV-C are dan­ge­rous: bey­ond cau­sing ery­thema, they incre­ase can­cer risk (inc­lu­ding mali­gnant mela­noma ari­sing from pig­ment cells) and inflict DNA damage. High-energy UV radia­tion is the­re­fore muta­ge­nic [2].

In short, despite the long-fashio­na­ble allure of tan­ning, mode­ra­tion is essen­tial, and we sho­uld shield our skin from UV’s harm­ful effects. The mar­ket offers many pro­tec­tive for­mu­la­tions such as cre­ams, oils, and sprays, all of which must incor­po­rate acti­ves that block dele­te­rious radia­tion while rema­i­ning safe for human use.

A repre­sen­ta­tive UV-bloc­king com­po­und, or more pre­ci­sely a stron­gly UV-absor­bing com­po­und, is diben­zy­li­de­ne­a­ce­tone. Its syn­the­sis is stra­i­ght­for­ward eno­ugh to carry out in a mode­stly equ­ip­ped uni­ver­sity, school, or even hob­by­ist lab. Demon­stra­tions with diben­zy­li­de­ne­a­ce­tone are not only instruc­tive but visu­ally stri­king and pro­vide an excel­lent invi­ta­tion to hands-on expe­ri­men­ta­tion.

Ilustracja
Ani­ma­tion: sup­ple­men­tary mate­rial

Rea­gents for the ayn­the­sis

For the syn­the­sis we will need the fol­lo­wing:

The first rea­gent, ben­zal­de­hyde, is the sim­plest aro­ma­tic alde­hyde (Fig.1).

Ilustracja
Fig. 1 – Struc­tu­ral for­mula of ben­zal­de­hyde

Ben­zal­de­hyde is a liquid with a cha­rac­te­ri­stic almond aroma and is natu­rally pre­sent in almonds Pru­nus dul­cis. Altho­ugh seve­ral com­po­unds that share this scent, such as hydro­gen cya­nide HCN and nitro­ben­zene C6H5NO2, are highly toxic, ben­zal­de­hyde itself is not con­si­de­red poi­so­nous. It has mul­ti­ple uses in the che­mi­cal and fra­grance indu­stries and in food appli­ca­tions, for exam­ple as a com­po­nent of almond oil used in marzi­pan pro­duc­tion. It oxi­di­zes rea­dily, even in air, so it sho­uld be sto­red in tigh­tly sea­led amber glass. Fresh, pure ben­zal­de­hyde is color­less but yel­lows over time. Older, more stron­gly colo­red sam­ples sho­uld be puri­fied (for exam­ple by distil­la­tion) before use.

Ace­tone is the sim­plest ali­pha­tic repre­sen­ta­tive of the ketone class (Fig.2).

Ilustracja
Fig. 2 – Struc­tu­ral for­mula of ace­tone

Ace­tone is rela­ti­vely vola­tile, with a sharp and easily reco­gni­zed odor that is often asso­cia­ted with nail-polish remo­ver, altho­ugh most modern remo­vers rely on ethyl ace­tate C4H8O2 instead. Small amo­unts of ace­tone are nor­mally found in human blood and urine, yet in uncon­trol­led advan­ced dia­be­tes its levels in the body may incre­ase shar­ply.

Altho­ugh ben­zal­de­hyde and ace­tone are not clas­si­fied as highly toxic, they can pose health risks if inge­sted, inha­led, or absor­bed in suf­fi­cient quan­ti­ties. Both sub­stan­ces may cause irri­ta­tion to skin and eyes, and con­tact sho­uld the­re­fore be avo­i­ded. Sodium hydro­xide solu­tions are stron­gly cau­stic and can inflict severe injury, making the use of eye pro­tec­tion impe­ra­tive. Ace­tone and com­mon alco­hols such as etha­nol and iso­pro­pa­nol are flam­ma­ble. Appro­priate per­so­nal pro­tec­tive equ­ip­ment must be used at all times.

The rea­gents are shown in Photo.1.

Photo.1 – Rea­gents used in the syn­the­sis; from left: ben­zal­de­hyde, sodium hydro­xide, ace­tone

As solvents in the syn­the­sis we will use water H2O and appro­xi­ma­tely 95% ethyl alco­hol C2H6O.

Syn­the­sis

The method descri­bed below is not the only via­ble route, but I have veri­fied it expe­ri­men­tally and can recom­mend it as stra­i­ght­for­ward and high-yiel­ding [3].

Pre­pare an alco­ho­lic ben­zal­de­hyde solu­tion by dis­so­lving 16 cm3 (≈0.54 fl oz) of ben­zal­de­hyde in 125 cm3 (≈4.23 fl oz) of etha­nol. The solu­tion sho­uld be color­less or only fain­tly yel­low and clear; any clo­u­di­ness likely indi­ca­tes impu­ri­ties. Because ben­zal­de­hyde oxi­di­zes rea­dily, pre­pare this solu­tion imme­dia­tely before pro­ce­e­ding.

Sepa­ra­tely, pre­pare a solu­tion of 9 g (≈0.32 oz) sodium hydro­xide in 75 cm3 (≈2.54 fl oz) of distil­led water. Dis­so­lu­tion is stron­gly exo­ther­mic and heats the liquid sub­stan­tially.

Before the next step, cool all solu­tions to room tem­pe­ra­ture, ide­ally below 20°C (68°F), with par­ti­cu­lar atten­tion to the sodium hydro­xide solu­tion. This is impor­tant because the for­th­co­ming reac­tion is exo­ther­mic, and exces­sive tem­pe­ra­ture rise can lower the yield.

Place the alco­ho­lic ben­zal­de­hyde solu­tion in a sui­ta­bly sized bea­ker, pre­fe­ra­bly on a magne­tic stir­rer (Photo.2). If a stir­rer is una­va­i­la­ble, vigo­rous manual stir­ring is requ­i­red.

Photo.2 – Alco­ho­lic solu­tion of ben­zal­de­hyde

Work quic­kly at this stage. With vigo­rous stir­ring, add the pre-coo­led sodium hydro­xide solu­tion in one por­tion. After only a few seconds of mixing, add 5 cm3 (≈0.17 fl oz) of ace­tone.

The ini­tially color­less mixture sho­uld turn tur­bid and yel­low within tens of seconds, and then dee­pen toward orange as the reac­tion pro­ce­eds (Photo.3).

Photo.3 – Color change of the reac­tion mixture

When tech­ni­cal-grade ace­tone is used, tran­sient other colors may appear. This effect is usu­ally short-lived and does not mate­rially affect the out­come. The most likely cul­prits are impu­ri­ties in ace­tone sold for solvent use, for exam­ple in pain­ting. Impu­ri­ties can, of course, also be intro­du­ced by other rea­gents.

Moni­tor the tem­pe­ra­ture and keep it within 20–25°C (68–77°F). If it rises above that range, cool the bea­ker in a water or ice bath.

After some time, an abun­dant yel­low pre­ci­pi­tate of diben­zy­li­de­ne­a­ce­tone forms (Photo.4). From the first appe­a­rance of the solid, con­ti­nue stir­ring for ano­ther 30–60 minu­tes to maxi­mize conver­sion.

Photo.4 – Pre­ci­pi­tate for­ming

After the allot­ted time, add about 100 cm3 (≈3.38 fl oz) of distil­led water. At this stage only part of the pro­duct has pre­ci­pi­ta­ted, while a sub­stan­tial frac­tion rema­ins dis­so­lved in the alco­ho­lic phase. Adding water dra­sti­cally redu­ces solu­bi­lity and cau­ses more solid to sepa­rate.

After tho­ro­ugh mixing and remo­ving the stir bar, allow the solid to sedi­ment. Wash it by decan­ta­tion with water seve­ral times until the washings are close to neu­tral pH, and then fil­ter. This pro­cess is time-con­su­ming, so if equ­ip­ment is ava­i­la­ble, ano­ther method is pre­fe­ra­ble.

Vacuum fil­tra­tion with on-fil­ter washing is more effi­cient. The setup con­si­sts of a sin­te­red-glass Büch­ner fun­nel sea­ted in a stop­per on a side-arm Büch­ner flask (Photo.5). Pro­tect the frit with a wet­ted fil­ter paper of sui­ta­ble dia­me­ter and con­nect the side arm to a vacuum source such as a water aspi­ra­tor or pump.

Photo.5 – Appa­ra­tus for vacuum fil­tra­tion

Trans­fer the reac­tion mixture into the fun­nel in one por­tion if the ves­sel volume allows, or other­wise in seve­ral por­tions (Photo.6). Then apply vacuum.

Photo.6 – Reac­tion mixture in the fun­nel

After the first fil­tra­tion, cover the cake with fresh distil­led water, gen­tly stir with a glass rod, and fil­ter again. Repeat this seve­ral times until the fil­trate appro­a­ches neu­tral pH. Then leave the vacuum on for a few minu­tes to par­tially dry the solid (Photo.7).

Photo.7 – Par­tially dried solid
Photo.8 – Dried diben­zy­li­de­ne­a­ce­tone

Remove resi­dual water by dry­ing at room tem­pe­ra­ture, ide­ally in a desic­ca­tor.

While the crude pro­duct is ade­qu­ate for sim­ple demon­stra­tions, puri­fi­ca­tion is pre­fe­ra­ble and requ­i­res lit­tle extra effort.

Puri­fi­ca­tion

Recry­stal­li­za­tion offers a stra­i­ght­for­ward route to purity. Dis­so­lve the crude diben­zy­li­de­ne­a­ce­tone in the mini­mum amo­unt of hot etha­nol or ano­ther sui­ta­ble alco­hol. I suc­cess­fully used iso­pro­pa­nol. Remem­ber that alco­hols are flam­ma­ble, so hea­ting must be car­ried out with cau­tion on an elec­tric hot­plate or equ­i­va­lent and never over an open flame.

Use just eno­ugh solvent to obtain a hot, satu­ra­ted solu­tion. Eva­po­rate a small por­tion of the solvent, then remove heat and allow the clear yel­low solu­tion to cool slowly (Photo.9A).

Photo.9 – Recry­stal­li­za­tion; A – hot, satu­ra­ted solu­tion; B – nuc­le­a­tion; C, D – sub­se­qu­ent sta­ges

Within minu­tes, nee­dle-like cry­stals typi­cally appear (Photo.9B). Soon, large amo­unts of pro­duct cry­stal­lize (Pho­tos 9C and 9D). After the solu­tion has coo­led to room tem­pe­ra­ture, refri­ge­rate for a few hours, for exam­ple over­ni­ght, to maxi­mize reco­very.

After decan­ting the resi­dual solu­tion, you can admire the well-for­med cry­stals, rewar­ding both as a syn­the­tic achie­ve­ment and as an aesthe­tic sight (Photo.10).

Photo.10 – Cry­stals of the puri­fied pro­duct

Rinse the cry­stals with a small amo­unt of the cold etha­nol and dry them. Store the puri­fied mate­rial for future expe­ri­ments in a tigh­tly sea­led amber bot­tle, cle­arly labe­led (Photo.11).

Photo.11 – Final pro­duct

Demon­stra­tions

To inve­sti­gate the opti­cal beha­vior of diben­zy­li­de­ne­a­ce­tone, pre­pare an etha­no­lic solu­tion near room-tem­pe­ra­ture satu­ra­tion. In con­trast to the com­pa­ri­son sam­ple of etha­nol without the com­po­und (Photo.12A), the solu­tion is distinc­tly yel­low (Photo.12B). It rema­ins sta­ble when sto­red in a tigh­tly sea­led amber vial kept in the dark.

Photo.12 – Solu­tions; A – etha­nol; B – etha­nol with diben­zy­li­de­ne­a­ce­tone

Place the ves­sels on a sheet of white prin­ter paper. Such paper con­ta­ins opti­cal bri­gh­te­ners that flu­o­re­sce stron­gly under UV, which allows us to assess the UV tran­s­mit­tance of each solu­tion. In visi­ble light, whe­ther vie­wed from the side or from above, both liqu­ids are tran­s­pa­rent and dif­fer only in color (Pho­tos 13A and 13B). We may the­re­fore infer that they tran­s­mit most visi­ble light.

Photo.13 – Illu­mi­na­tion effects; A – visi­ble light (side view); B – visi­ble light (top view);
C – UV light (top view). Left ves­sel: etha­nol; right ves­sel: etha­nol with diben­zy­li­de­ne­a­ce­tone

Under UV illu­mi­na­tion the pic­ture chan­ges (Photo.13C). The paper flu­o­re­sces bri­ght blue, and pure etha­nol does not flu­o­re­sce, so the paper bene­ath it glows as bri­gh­tly as the sur­ro­un­dings. In con­trast, the ves­sel with diben­zy­li­de­ne­a­ce­tone appe­ars dark, almost black, when vie­wed from above, and the paper bene­ath it shows almost no flu­o­re­scence. The effect is visi­ble even with lay­ers only a few mil­li­me­ters deep (Photo.14).

Photo.14 – Absorp­tion by a thin layer of the diben­zy­li­de­ne­a­ce­tone solu­tion;
A – visi­ble light; B – UV light

This con­firms that the com­po­und stron­gly absorbs UV light. We can demon­strate this in ano­ther way as well.

Cya­no­type, an iron-based pho­to­gra­phic pro­cess rather than a silver-based one, offers a conve­nient test. In a pre­vious issue of Che­mi­stry… I descri­bed syn­the­si­zing potas­sium tris(oxa­lato)fer­rate(III) K3[Fe3(C2O4)3]·3H2O as a light-sen­si­tive com­plex and its use in noble pho­to­gra­phic pro­ces­ses [4]. Altho­ugh the com­po­unds employed are not highly toxic, they can be irri­ta­ting, and hexa­cy­a­no­fer­ra­tes in strong acids can rele­ase toxic hydro­gen cya­nide.

To pre­pare light-sen­si­tive paper, make an aqu­e­ous solu­tion con­ta­i­ning equal parts of the oxa­late com­plex and potas­sium fer­ri­cy­a­nide K3[Fe(CN)6], at con­cen­tra­tions up to a few per­cent, opti­mi­zed empi­ri­cally. Soak fil­ter-paper disks and dry them. Pre­pare, impre­gnate, and dry the paper in dark­ness or under a red safe­li­ght to pre­vent early expo­sure. The pre­pa­red disk appe­ars green (Photo.15).

Photo.15 – Light-sen­si­tive paper

Cover the paper with a glass plate, in this case a large Petri dish, cros­sed with black adhe­sive tape strips to divide the paper into four sec­tors (Photo.16). This arran­ge­ment allows one disk to test mul­ti­ple con­di­tions by apply­ing dif­fe­rent mate­rials onto the glass:

Photo.16 – Light-sen­si­tive paper pre­pa­red for expo­sure; see text

Gly­ce­rol slows dry­ing, but for lon­ger expo­su­res the liqu­ids on sec­tors 2 and 3 sho­uld be reap­plied perio­di­cally. In sec­tor 4, a tran­s­pa­rent sun­screen labe­led SPF 30 was used, which blocks about 97% of UV-B [5].

Expose the assem­bly to direct sun­li­ght, adju­sting the expo­sure time expe­ri­men­tally. Arti­fi­cial light sour­ces may also be used, altho­ugh they usu­ally requ­ire lon­ger illu­mi­na­tion. Stop the expo­sure once the con­trol sec­tor 1 has tur­ned distinc­tly blue. Disas­sem­ble the setup, gen­tly rinse the paper in cool run­ning water to remove unre­ac­ted spe­cies, and allow it to dry. The result is shown in Photo.17.

Photo.17 – Light-sen­si­tive paper after expo­sure and pro­ces­sing; see text

Nei­ther the bare glass in sec­tor 1 nor the etha­nol in sec­tor 2 pro­vi­des pro­tec­tion, as shown by the for­ma­tion of Prus­sian blue on the paper [6]. This reac­tion is espe­cially effi­cient under high-energy UV light. The areas cove­red with tape remain unco­lo­red. In con­trast, the sec­tions tre­a­ted with the diben­zy­li­de­ne­a­ce­tone solu­tion (sec­tor 3) and with sun­screen (sec­tor 4) appear almost clear to the eye but show only faint expo­sure. Under these con­di­tions, our solu­tion wor­ked nearly as well as the com­mer­cial pro­duct in bloc­king UV.

A sim­pler demon­stra­tion is also pos­si­ble. Depo­sit a drop of the diben­zy­li­de­ne­a­ce­tone solu­tion on flu­o­re­scent paper and let it dry (Photo.18). The dried spot is fain­tly yel­low and barely visi­ble in nor­mal light.

Photo.18 – Diben­zy­li­de­ne­a­ce­tone applied to paper (visi­ble light)

Under UV illu­mi­na­tion, the spot appe­ars dark aga­inst the paper’s bri­ght blue flu­o­re­scence (Photo.19).

Photo.19 – Diben­zy­li­de­ne­a­ce­tone applied to paper (UV light)

One more obse­rva­tion can be made by cove­ring part of the spot with black paper and then irra­dia­ting with UV light (Photo.20A).

Photo.20 – Pro­lon­ged irra­dia­tion of diben­zy­li­de­ne­a­ce­tone; A – par­tial masking; B – resul­ting effect

Expla­na­tion

The syn­the­sis is an exam­ple of an aldol con­den­sa­tion, a base-cata­ly­zed reac­tion that forms 3-aldols (alde­hy­des bea­ring a hydro­xyl group at the third car­bon rela­tive to −CHO) from two car­bo­nyl sub­stra­tes. At least one of the sub­stra­tes must con­tain an α-hydro­gen on the car­bon adja­cent to the car­bo­nyl group. The medium is typi­cally basic. Sub­stra­tes may con­sist of two alde­hy­des, two keto­nes, or one alde­hyde and one ketone. In this con­text, keto­nes are gene­rally less reac­tive [7].

Aldol con­den­sa­tion can also occur between iden­ti­cal mole­cu­les, which yields mixtu­res. To avoid this, one sub­strate can be cho­sen without α-hydro­gens, such as ben­zal­de­hyde, and con­di­tions can be adju­sted accor­din­gly.

Why is it impor­tant to add ace­tone imme­dia­tely after mixing ben­zal­de­hyde with NaOH? In a stron­gly basic medium, ben­zal­de­hyde under­goes the Can­niz­zaro reac­tion, which dispro­por­tio­na­tes it into ben­zyl alco­hol C7H8O and ben­zoic acid C7H6O2 [8]. Delay­ing the addi­tion of ace­tone allows this side path­way to con­sume ben­zal­de­hyde, the­reby redu­cing the yield of diben­zy­li­de­ne­a­ce­tone.

The main reac­tion between ben­zal­de­hyde and ace­tone in a basic aqu­e­ous–alco­ho­lic medium (NaOH) is:

2 C7H6O + C3H6O → C17H14O + 2 H2O

Diben­zy­li­de­ne­a­ce­tone can in prin­ci­ple form three geo­me­tric iso­mers. Under these con­di­tions the trans-trans iso­mer domi­na­tes, as it is more sta­ble than the cis-cis and cis-trans forms (Fig.3).

Ilustracja
Fig. 3 – Iso­mers of diben­zy­li­de­ne­a­ce­tone; a – cis-cis, b – cis-trans, c – trans-trans

In my expe­ri­ments, the yield was about 75% of the the­o­re­ti­cal value, which is a respec­ta­ble out­come. Lite­ra­ture methods report yields of about 80% or higher under opti­mi­zed con­di­tions [9].

Diben­zy­li­de­ne­a­ce­tone is a yel­low cry­stal­line solid. It dis­so­lves well in alco­hols but is essen­tially inso­lu­ble in water. Bey­ond the UV-shiel­ding pro­per­ties demon­stra­ted here, it also serves as a ligand in orga­no­me­tal­lic che­mi­stry.

Mole­cu­les absorb elec­tro­ma­gne­tic radia­tion at wave­leng­ths deter­mi­ned by their elec­tro­nic struc­ture. The absor­bed energy is not lost; it is conver­ted into other forms. In pho­spho­re­scence, a por­tion of the energy is re-emit­ted at lon­ger wave­leng­ths (Sto­kes shift), as seen with UV-exci­ted flu­o­re­scent whi­te­ning agents in paper.

For diben­zy­li­de­ne­a­ce­tone, most of the absor­bed UV energy dis­si­pa­tes as heat.

The yel­low color of the solu­tion indi­ca­tes that the com­po­und absorbs invi­si­ble UV light as well as, to a smal­ler degree, visi­ble light from the blue region of the spec­trum.

Because UV light car­ries higher energy (shor­ter wave­length) than visi­ble light, many pho­to­sen­si­tive sys­tems respond more stron­gly to it, as our cya­no­type expe­ri­ment demon­stra­ted. It also sho­wed that even a thin layer of the diben­zy­li­de­ne­a­ce­tone solu­tion pro­vi­des sub­stan­tial UV atte­nu­a­tion, com­pa­ra­ble to com­mer­cial pro­ducts.

There is, howe­ver, a caveat. The very effi­ciency with which diben­zy­li­de­ne­a­ce­tone absorbs UV light makes it pho­to­la­bile. Upon UV exci­ta­tion, mole­cu­les become reac­tive and undergo cyc­lo­ad­di­tion, pro­du­cing a mixture of pro­ducts. Pro­lon­ged irra­dia­tion the­re­fore dimi­ni­shes UV absorp­tion (see Photo.20). Many sun­screen acti­ves share this limi­ta­tion, which is why the prac­ti­cal advice is to reap­ply sun­screen at regu­lar inte­rvals. Modern for­mu­la­tions, of course, inc­lude addi­tio­nal com­po­nents that streng­then UV pro­tec­tion.

Refe­ren­ces:

All pho­to­gra­phs and illu­stra­tions were cre­a­ted by the author.

The above text inc­lu­des minor edi­to­rial modi­fi­ca­tions com­pa­red to the ver­sion publi­shed in the jour­nal, aimed at sup­ple­men­ting and adap­ting it for online pre­sen­ta­tion.

Marek Ples

Aa