Weird Science

Phosphorus, the Light of Alchemy

Polish ver­sion is here

The fol­lo­wing article was ori­gi­nally publi­shed in the jour­nal for edu­ca­tors Che­mia w Szkole (eng. Che­mi­stry in School) (2/2019):

Ilustracja

Ples M., Fos­for - alche­miczne świa­tło (eng. Pho­spho­rus, the Light of Alchemy), Che­mia w Szkole (eng. Che­mi­stry in School), 2 (2019), Agen­cja AS Józef Szew­czyk, pp. 13-17

Alchemy was an ancient prac­tice that wove toge­ther ele­ments now belon­ging to seve­ral modern scien­ti­fic disci­pli­nes, chie­fly che­mi­stry and phy­sics, but also art, psy­cho­logy, and others. The most widely reco­gni­zed goals of alche­mi­sts inc­lu­ded disco­ve­ring a method to tran­s­mute lead and other base metals into gold, cre­a­ting a pana­cea capa­ble of curing all dise­a­ses, and pre­pa­ring an eli­xir of immor­ta­lity. At the cen­ter of these que­sts stood the legen­dary phi­lo­so­pher’s stone, a myste­rious sub­stance whose elu­sive pur­suit con­su­med the life­ti­mes of many.

Today, the field is often ridi­cu­led for the naïveté (from a modern per­spec­tive) of many of its prac­ti­ces and cla­ims. Alche­mi­sts did not, as a rule, employ any­thing resem­bling what we now reco­gnize as the scien­ti­fic method. Yet it must be ack­now­led­ged that the work of some was sys­te­ma­tic and did yield tan­gi­ble results. Indeed, the gro­un­dwork laid by alchemy paved the way for the emer­gence of true science in the modern sense, inc­lu­ding che­mi­stry itself. A simi­lar tran­s­i­tion occur­red in astro­nomy, which gra­du­ally distin­gu­i­shed itself from the mysti­cal fra­me­work of astro­logy.

One of the nota­ble achie­ve­ments of alche­mi­sts was the disco­very of nume­rous new sub­stan­ces. Among them was the ele­ment pho­spho­rus P, first iso­la­ted in 1669 by the Ger­man Hen­nig (or Hen­ning) Brand [1]. The English pain­ter Joseph Wri­ght, wor­king in the eigh­te­enth cen­tury, immor­ta­li­zed this disco­very in one of his canva­ses (Photo.1).

Fig.1 – The Alche­mist Disco­ve­ring Pho­spho­rus by Joseph Wri­ght of Derby

public domain, source: https://com­mons.wiki­me­dia.org/wiki/File:Joseph_Wri­ght_of_Derby_The_Alche­mist.jpg, [acces­sed: 4.03.2019]

In this work, the artist pre­sen­ted his vision of Brand’s labo­ra­tory. Notice the retort con­ta­i­ning the newly iso­la­ted pho­spho­rus, glo­wing with an other­worl­dly light. This detail was not Wri­ght’s inven­tion, altho­ugh he did exag­ge­rate the lumi­ne­scence con­si­de­ra­bly.

We now know that the glow is cau­sed by the slow oxi­da­tion of the newly disco­ve­red ele­ment. That is why it was named pho­spho­rus (from the Greek "pho­spho­ros," mea­ning “li­ght bea­rer”). Inte­re­stin­gly, had the Latin root been cho­sen instead, the sub­stance might have been cal­led luci­fer, car­ry­ing pre­ci­sely the same mea­ning (from Latin "lux" - "light" and "ferre" - "to bring"). But let us set ety­mo­logy aside for now.

Would today’s prac­ti­tio­ner of the che­mi­cal arts, lea­ving alchemy to the histo­rians, wish to explore at least some of the intri­gu­ing pro­per­ties of pho­spho­rus? The answer, I believe, can only be yes, espe­cially since doing so does not requ­ire sophi­sti­ca­ted labo­ra­tory faci­li­ties. Still, it must be empha­si­zed with abso­lute cla­rity that any expe­ri­ments with this sub­stance demand the utmost cau­tion, given its dan­ge­rous pro­per­ties.

Dif­fe­rent Forms

Pho­spho­rus is a clas­sic exam­ple of allo­tropy, a phe­no­me­non in which a sin­gle ele­ment can exist in dif­fe­rent modi­fi­ca­tions, each with distinct phy­si­cal and che­mi­cal pro­per­ties. These allo­tro­pes may vary in their cry­stal­line struc­tu­res or in the num­ber of atoms per mole­cule [2].

Trans­for­ma­tions between allo­tro­pes are first-order phase tran­s­i­tions, invo­lving a discon­ti­nu­ous change in a state func­tion such as entropy, while ther­mo­dy­na­mic equ­i­li­brium is main­ta­i­ned. Such pro­ces­ses drive the sys­tem toward mini­mi­zing its free energy. An ele­ment may the­re­fore exist in two allo­tro­pic forms at the same tem­pe­ra­ture, altho­ugh under spe­ci­fic con­di­tions one form is more sta­ble than the other.

Allo­tropy is obse­rved in many ele­ments. Car­bon is per­haps the best known, occur­ring as gra­phite, dia­mond, nano­tu­bes, and seve­ral other forms.

Pho­spho­rus occurs in four allo­tro­pes:

For our pur­po­ses, the white and red forms are the most rele­vant. The others are che­mi­cally far less reac­tive. Vio­let pho­spho­rus can be obta­i­ned either by hea­ting red pho­spho­rus in a vacuum above 500°C (932°F) or by cry­stal­li­zing white pho­spho­rus from mol­ten lead, whe­reas black pho­spho­rus is pre­pa­red by hea­ting white pho­spho­rus in the absence of oxy­gen at 220°C (428°F) under a pres­sure of 12,000 atmo­sphe­res [3].

Red and White

White pho­spho­rus is the most che­mi­cally reac­tive allo­trope. It appe­ars as a whi­tish or yel­lo­wish wax-like solid with a mel­ting point of 44°C (111°F) and a den­sity of 1.8 g/cm3 [4]. Each mole­cule con­si­sts of four atoms arran­ged in a regu­lar tetra­he­dral struc­ture.

Altho­ugh white pho­spho­rus does not react with water, it must be care­fully shiel­ded from air because it oxi­di­zes vio­len­tly upon expo­sure. For this rea­son, it is sto­red under distil­led water in sea­led con­ta­i­ners.

White pho­spho­rus is extre­mely toxic. The lethal dose for an adult, whe­ther inge­sted or inha­led, is about 0.1 g (0.0035 oz). This fact alone requ­i­res extra­or­di­nary cau­tion in han­dling, ide­ally with heat-resi­stant trays made of cera­mic or a com­pa­ra­ble mate­rial. Work with both white and red pho­spho­rus must always be car­ried out under strict per­so­nal and fire safety pre­cau­tions.

The che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence of white pho­spho­rus is easy to demon­strate. A frag­ment only a few mil­li­me­ters in size can be blot­ted dry and pla­ced on an inert, non­flam­ma­ble sur­face such as cera­mic or heat-resi­stant glass. Even when kept under water, the sur­face of a sam­ple often deve­lops an oxide film over time (Photo.2A), but this does not inter­fere with the obse­rva­tion.

In a dar­ke­ned room, the sam­ple emits a distinct glow (Photo.2B), often sho­wing a sub­tle whi­tish-green hue.

Photo.2 – White pho­spho­rus; A – sam­ple, B – glow obse­rved in dark­ness (ISO­400, expo­sure: 15s)

Such demon­stra­tions must be brief. As pho­spho­rus oxi­di­zes, it gra­du­ally warms and may ignite spon­ta­ne­o­u­sly. Solid pie­ces can ignite at only a few tens of degrees Cel­sius, and some sour­ces report igni­tion occur­ring at tem­pe­ra­tu­res as low as 20°C (68°F). In pow­de­red form, pho­spho­rus igni­tes imme­dia­tely. Bur­ning white pho­spho­rus rea­ches tem­pe­ra­tu­res of about 1000°C (1832°F), resi­sts extin­gu­i­shing with water, and pro­du­ces highly cor­ro­sive fumes of P4O10 and its hydro­ly­sis pro­ducts. For this rea­son, once the glow has been obse­rved, the sam­ple must be promp­tly retur­ned bene­ath the sur­face of water.

A histo­ri­cal foren­sic test for detec­ting pho­spho­rus, inc­lu­ding its pre­sence in human tis­sues suspec­ted of poi­so­ning, relied on obse­rving the che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence of vapo­ri­zed white pho­spho­rus. This method became known as the Mit­scher­lich test.

One of the dar­ker chap­ters in the history of che­mi­stry is the use of white pho­spho­rus in war­fare, most noto­rio­u­sly in incen­diary bombs.

The second allo­tro­pic form of inte­rest is red pho­spho­rus, which occurs as a dark red pow­der (Photo.3) and is inso­lu­ble in all com­mon solvents.

Photo.3 – Red pho­spho­rus

Unlike white pho­spho­rus, the red allo­trope is not inhe­ren­tly toxic. Never­the­less, sam­ples must still be han­dled with care, as they may con­tain trace but hazar­dous amo­unts of white pho­spho­rus as an impu­rity. Red pho­spho­rus is far less reac­tive, does not oxi­dize under nor­mal con­di­tions, and does not need to be sto­red under water. Its igni­tion requ­i­res much higher tem­pe­ra­tu­res.

Altho­ugh han­dling red pho­spho­rus is safer, it still requ­i­res pro­per pre­cau­tions. A sim­ple test demon­stra­tes this. Place a tiny frac­tion of a gram on a cera­mic plate and ignite it (Photo.4A). It burns less vio­len­tly than white pho­spho­rus but pro­du­ces a simi­lar white smoke of pho­spho­rus oxi­des. Cove­ring the sam­ple with a glass ves­sel cuts off oxy­gen and extin­gu­i­shes the flame (Photo.4B). Stri­kin­gly, once unco­ve­red, the mate­rial may rei­gnite spon­ta­ne­o­u­sly. Heat from com­bu­stion converts some of the red allo­trope into white, which igni­tes rea­dily and trans­fers the flame back to the red form (Photo.4C). Fires invo­lving red pho­spho­rus can the­re­fore be just as dif­fi­cult to extin­gu­ish as those invo­lving white pho­spho­rus.

Photo.4 – Com­bu­stion of red pho­spho­rus; A – after igni­tion, B – extin­gu­i­shed, C – spon­ta­ne­ous rei­gni­tion

White Pho­spho­rus from Mat­ches

White pho­spho­rus is not rea­dily ava­i­la­ble today, and for good rea­son, above all because of its extreme toxi­city.

So what is an expe­ri­men­ter to do if they wish to expe­rience, at least in part, what Brand might have felt in his alche­mi­cal work­shop upon enco­un­te­ring this remar­ka­ble sub­stance? For­tu­na­tely, there is a sim­ple method using ordi­nary mat­ches (Photo.5).

Photo.5 – Mat­ches

Some rea­ders may be sur­pri­sed, since it has long been known that mat­ches with heads con­ta­i­ning white pho­spho­rus have not been manu­fac­tu­red since the late nine­te­enth and early twen­tieth cen­tu­ries. Public con­cern, fue­led by fre­qu­ent poi­so­nings and acci­den­tal fires because such mat­ches were prone to spon­ta­ne­ous igni­tion, led to the signing of an inter­na­tio­nal conven­tion ban­ning white pho­spho­rus in match pro­duc­tion (Bern, Sep­tem­ber 26, 1906). Poland acce­ded to this tre­aty in 1921 [5].

Modern mat­ches the­re­fore con­tain no white pho­spho­rus. Instead, they rely on red pho­spho­rus, loca­ted not in the match head but in the stri­king sur­face, the abra­sive strip. This strip also con­ta­ins other ingre­dients, such as pow­de­red glass, which pro­vi­des the neces­sary rou­gh­ness.

To convert the red pho­spho­rus in the stri­king sur­face into white pho­spho­rus and obse­rve its che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence, cut away a por­tion of the strip from a match­box and care­fully sepa­rate the thin­nest pos­si­ble layer of coa­ted paper (Photo.6). This mini­mi­zes the unne­ces­sary bulk of card­bo­ard mate­rial.

Photo.6 – Sec­tion of stri­king sur­face cut from a match­box

Next, fold the paper into a tro­ugh with the coa­ted side facing inward and place it on a cold metal or glass sur­face, such as the bot­tom of an inver­ted Petri dish (Photo.7A). Light the paper (Photo.7B) and let it to char (Photo.7C).

Photo.7 – Con­duc­ting the expe­ri­ment; A – strip pla­ced on a cold sur­face (coa­ting side down), B – igni­tion, C – char­red paper

After the paper has bur­ned away, a dark, resi­nous depo­sit forms on the cold glass sur­face (Photo.8).

Photo.8 – Depo­sit on glass sur­face

This depo­sit con­ta­ins, along with com­bu­stion pro­ducts and bin­ding agents, trace amo­unts of white pho­spho­rus for­med from the red allo­trope in the strike sur­face. The quan­tity is minute but suf­fi­cient: in a dar­ke­ned room, once the eyes have adju­sted, a faint gre­e­nish glow beco­mes visi­ble (Photo.9). As the outer layer oxi­di­zes, the lumi­ne­scence fades. Scra­ping the depo­sit expo­ses fresh pho­spho­rus, cau­sing the glow to bri­gh­ten again. Even­tu­ally, howe­ver, all of the pho­spho­rus oxi­di­zes and the pro­cess comes to an end.

Photo.9 – Che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence (ISO­200, expo­sure: 30s)

This method is rela­ti­vely safe, since it gene­ra­tes only trace amo­unts of the hazar­dous allo­trope. Even so, cau­tion rema­ins abso­lu­tely essen­tial.

Sli­gh­tly lar­ger quan­ti­ties of white pho­spho­rus can be obta­i­ned by pla­cing a few mil­li­grams of the red allo­trope at the bot­tom of a nar­row test tube and displa­cing the air with car­bon dio­xide to pro­tect the pro­duct from oxi­da­tion. The tube is then stop­pe­red with a plug of glass wool. Gen­tle hea­ting of the base of the tube with a bur­ner converts the red allo­trope into white, which vapo­ri­zes. If the walls are coo­led at the same time, for exam­ple by wrap­ping them with wet fil­ter paper, the vapors con­dense into a whi­tish depo­sit [6]. After coo­ling and remo­ving the stop­per, the depo­sit glows cle­arly upon con­tact with air (Photo.10). The appa­rent color dif­fe­ren­ces in the pho­to­gra­phs result from varia­tions in camera white balance; in rea­lity, the glow was simi­lar to that obse­rved in the ear­lier demon­stra­tions.

Photo.10 – White pho­spho­rus in a test tube (ISO­100, expo­sure: 20s)

It must be empha­si­zed once again: white pho­spho­rus is extre­mely dan­ge­rous! Even the smal­lest frag­ment discar­ded in a waste con­ta­i­ner can spon­ta­ne­o­u­sly ignite after some time, cau­sing a fire. Its toxi­city poses an addi­tio­nal risk. All resi­dues must be ren­de­red harm­less, for exam­ple, by inci­ne­ra­tion under con­trol­led con­di­tions or by pro­lon­ged sha­king with a solu­tion of cop­per(II) sul­fate (CuSO4), which converts the pho­spho­rus into sta­ble pho­sphi­des [7].

Expla­na­tion

The light emit­ted by white pho­spho­rus ari­ses from its oxi­da­tion, as shown by the fact that lumi­ne­scence cea­ses under ana­e­ro­bic con­di­tions. Most che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scent reac­tions can be descri­bed by the gene­ral scheme:

X → [Y]* → Y + hν

Here, sub­strate X is trans­for­med into an inter­me­diate [Y]* in a high-energy exci­ted state. Because such sta­tes are inhe­ren­tly unsta­ble, the inter­me­diate rela­xes to a lower-energy final pro­duct Y. The excess energy is rele­a­sed as radiant energy, .

For pho­spho­rus, the ele­ment is first oxi­di­zed to lower oxi­des, which are then fur­ther oxi­di­zed to pho­spho­rus(V) oxide, P2O5, more accu­ra­tely repre­sen­ted as P4O10. This reac­tion acco­unts for the visi­ble glow [8]. The obse­rva­tion that lumi­ne­scence wea­kens or even disap­pe­ars when pho­spho­rus is expo­sed to pure oxy­gen sup­ports this expla­na­tion: under such con­di­tions, oxi­da­tion pro­ce­eds direc­tly to the final oxide without gene­ra­ting exci­ted inter­me­dia­tes.

The phe­no­me­non resem­bles the che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence I have pre­vio­u­sly descri­bed during the oxi­da­tion of sodium Na [9]. The com­pa­ri­son is stri­king because the sub­stan­ces belong to enti­rely dif­fe­rent cate­go­ries: white pho­spho­rus is a typi­cal non­me­tal (with only black pho­spho­rus sho­wing semi­con­duc­ting beha­vior), while sodium is a pro­to­ty­pi­cal metal.

We can the­re­fore conc­lude that pho­spho­rus displays highly unu­sual pro­per­ties, and that che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence is nei­ther as rare nor as exo­tic as it may seem. Indeed, it can be demon­stra­ted with mate­rials rea­dily ava­i­la­ble in the home.

Refe­ren­ces:

All pho­to­gra­phs and illu­stra­tions were cre­a­ted by the author.

The above text inc­lu­des minor edi­to­rial modi­fi­ca­tions com­pa­red to the ver­sion publi­shed in the jour­nal, aimed at sup­ple­men­ting and adap­ting it for online pre­sen­ta­tion.

Adden­dum

The video below shows the che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence of pho­spho­rus:

Sim­ple as it is, the effect is defi­ni­tely worth recom­men­ding.

Marek Ples

Aa